The semester has started again at MIT, which means I’m teaching a new iteration of my Data Storytelling Studio course. One of our first sessions focuses on learning to ask questions of your data… and this year that was a great change to use the new WTFcsv tool I created with Catherine D’Ignazio.
The vast majority of the students decided to work with our fun UFO sample data. They came up with some amazing questions to ask, with a lot of ideas about connecting it to other datasets. A few focused in on potential correlations with sci-fi shows on TV (perhaps inspired by the recent reboot of the X Files).
One topic I reflected on with students at the close of the activity was that the majority of their questions, and the language they used to describe them, came from a point of view that doubted the legitimacy of these UFO sightings. They wanted to “explain” the “real” reason for what people saw. They were assuming that the sightings were people imagining what they saw was aliens, which of course couldn’t be true.
Now, with UFO sightings this isn’t especially offensive. However, with datasets about more serious topics, it’s important to remember that we should approach them from an empathetic point of view. If we want to understand data reported by people, we need to have empathy for where the data reporter is coming from, despite any biases or pre-existing notions we might have about the legitimacy of the what they say happened.
This isn’t to say that we shouldn’t be skeptical of data; by all means we should be! However, if we only wear our skeptical hat we miss a whole variety of possible questions we could be asking our dataset.
So, when it comes to UFO sightings, be sure to wonder “What would Mulder do?” 🙂